Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Organisasi Pengelola Zakat Transparency and Accountability of Zakat Management Organizations

Main Article Content

Yessi Fitri
Rini Rini
Amilin Amilin

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the transparency and accountability of zakat management organizations/OPZ through website-based reporting and to analyze priority issues and strategies to increase transparency and accountability of OPZ through website-based reporting. Content analysis is used to analyze transparency as measured by Itranz and accountability as measured by the website-based Islamic accountability index while determining priority issues and strategies to increase transparency and accountability of OPZ through website-based reporting is carried out using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method. This study found that the level of OPZ transparency through website-based reporting was 6% transparent OPZ, 55% quite transparent OPZ, 29% less transparent OPZ and 10% non-transparent OPZ. The level of OPZ accountability through website-based reporting is 13% very high accountability OPZ, 16% high accountability OPZ, 7% medium accountability OPZ, 19% low accountability OPZ, and 45% very low accountability OPZ. The priority issue is compliance with sharia regulations and law and the most priority strategy in increasing OPZ transparency and accountability through website-based reporting is amil standardization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fitri, Yessi, Rini Rini, and Amilin Amilin. “Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas Organisasi Pengelola Zakat: Transparency and Accountability of Zakat Management Organizations”. Jurnal Bimas Islam 17, no. 1 (July 31, 2024): 215–243. Accessed December 21, 2024. https://jurnalbimasislam.kemenag.go.id/jbi/article/view/1013.
Section
Articles

References

Abdullah, Zaimah, Mohd Hisham Mohd Sharif, Ram Al Jaffri Saad, Arifatul Husna Mohd Ariff, Md Hairi Md Hussain, and Mohd Herry Mohd Nasir. “Zakat Institutions’ Adoption of Social Media.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-01-2022-0013.

Amalia, Euis. “Good Governance for Zakat Institutions in Indonesia: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 27, no. 3 (2019): 1815–27.

———. “The Shariah Governance Framework For Strengthening Zakat Management in Indonesia: A Critical Review of Zakat Regulations.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 162, no. Iclj 2017 (2018): 133–38. https://doi.org/10.2991/iclj-17.2018.28.

Antonio, Muhammad Syafii, Sugiyarti Fatma Laela, Dhimas Mukhlas, and Al Ghifari. “Optimizing Zakat Collection in the Digital Era : Muzakki’s Perception.” Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis 7, no. 2 (2020): 235–54.

Ascarya. “Analytic Network Process (ANP): Pendekatan Baru Studi Kualitatif.” Seminar Intern Program Magister Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Di Universitas Trisakti, 2005, 1–52.

Ascarya, and Diana Yumanita. “Analisis Rendahnya Pengumpulan Zakat Di Indonesia Dan Alternatif Solusinya.” Bank Sentral Indonesia, 2018.

Dainelli, Francesco, Giacomo Manetti, and Barbara Sibilio. “Web-Based Accountability Practices in Non-Profit Organizations: The Case of National Museums.” Voluntas 24, no. 3 (2013): 649–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9278-9.

Direktur Jenderal Pajak. “Lampiran I Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-15/PJ/2022 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-04/PJ/2022 Tentang Badan Atau Lembaga Yang Dibentuk Atau Disahkan Oleh Pemerintah Yang Ditetapkan Sebagai Penerima Zakat,” 2022.

Emzir, Emzir. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Analisis Data. Cetakan 6. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Gandía, Juan L. “Internet Disclosure by Nonprofit Organizations: Empirical Evidence of Nongovernmental Organizations for Development in Spain.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40, no. 1 (2011): 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009343782.

Hikmaningsih, Hetty, and Bambang Agus Pramuka. “Akuntabilitas Pada Lembaga Amil Zakat Infak Dan Sedekah Dalam Perspektif Shari’Ah Enterprise Theory (Set).” Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi 22, no. 9 (2020): 358–67. https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v22i3.1644.

Hule, Cynthia Van, and Nico Dewaelheyns. “Why Do Private Non-Profit Organization Provide Information On The Internet?” Social Enterorise Journal 10, no. 1 (2014): 69–86.

Humas Baznas. “BAZNAS: Zakat Masyarakat Yang Tak Tercatat Rp 61,25 Triliun,” 2020. https://baznas.go.id/Press_Release/baca/BAZNAS_:_Zakat_Masyarakat_yang_Tak_Tercatat_Rp_61,25_Triliun/680.

———. “Jaga Kepercayaan Masyarakat, BAZNAS Konsisten Terapkan Prinsip 3A Dalam Pengelolaan Zakat 1 Agustus 2022,” 2022.

Hyndman, Noel, and Danielle McConville. “Trust and Accountability in UK Charities: Exploring the Virtuous Circle.” British Accounting Review, 2017, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.004.

Jayanto, Prabowo Yudo, and Siti Munawaroh. “The Influences of Reputation, Financial Statement Transparency, Accountability, Religiosity, and Trust on Interest in Paying Zakat of Profession.” Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi 11, no. 1 (2019): 59–69. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v11i1.18729.

Junjunan, Mohammad Ilyas, M. Maulana Asegaf, and Moh Takwil. “Pengaruh Transparansi, Akuntabilitas, Dan IGCG Terhadap Tingkat Kepercayaan Muzzaki Di Lembaga Amil Zakat Dompet Amah Umat.” Akuntansi: Jurnal Akuntansi Integratif 6, no. 2 (2020): 112–25.

Karim, Nina Karina, Elin Erlina Sasanti, Indria Puspitasari Lenap, and Nungki Kartika Sari. “Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Zakat Berbasis Website Pada Lembaga Pengelola Zakat Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Aksioma 18, no. 2 (2019): 13–28.

Kementrian Agama RI. “Rakornas Zakat 2023, Menag: Literasi Kunci Pengelolaan Zakat Nasional.” Kemenag.co.id, 2023.

Mubtadi, Novendi Arkham. “Analysis of Islamic Accountability and Islamic Governance in Zakat Institution.” Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review 3, no. 1 (2019): 1. https://doi.org/10.26487/hebr.v3i1.1544.

Nurlis, and Winwin Yudiati. “The Influence of Internal Control Effectiveness , Information Technology Utilization and Human Resources Competence on Local Government Financial Reporting Quality ( Survey on SKPD Banten Provincial Government and Serang City).” Research Journal of Finance and Accounting 8, no. 12 (2017): 111–24.

Puskas BAZNAS. Indeks Transparansi Organisasi Pengelola Zakat (OPZ). Puskas BAZNAS. Jakarta: Puskas Baznas, 2019.

Rini, Rini. “Penerapan Internet Financial Reporting Untuk Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Organisasi Pengelola Zakat.” Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, no. 95 (2016): 288–306. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2016.08.7022.

Rossi, Gina, Chiara Leardini, and Stefano Landi. “The More You Know, The More You Give: Influence of Online Disclosure on European Community Foundations’ Donations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 31, no. 1 (2020): 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21412.

Sarman, Siti Rahayu, Saunah Zainon, Ruhaya Atan, Zarina Abu Bakar, Soo Kum Yoke, Syahrul Ahmar Ahmad, and Nur Hidayah Mohd Shaari. “The Web-Based Accountability Practices in Social Enterprises: Validating the Stakeholder Theory.” Procedia Economics and Finance 31, no. 15 (2015): 243–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01226-5.

Siswantoro, Dodik, Haula Rosdiana, and Heri Fathurahman. “Islamic Accountability Index of Cash Waqf Institution in Indonesia.” Competition and Cooperation in Economics and Business, 2018, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315225227.

Wahyuni-TD, Ika Sari, Hasnah Haron, and Yudi Fernando. “The Effects of Good Governance and Fraud Prevention on Performance of The Zakat Institutions in Indonesia: A Sharīʿah Forensic Accounting Perspective.” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2019-0089.

Widiastuti, Tika, Eko Fajar Cahyono, Siti Zulaikha, Imron Mawardi, and Muhammad Ubaidillah Al Mustofa. “Optimizing Zakat Governance in East Java Using Analytical Network Process (ANP): The Role of Zakat Technology (ZakaTech).” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 12, no. 3 (2021): 301–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0307.

Most read articles by the same author(s)