Problem Paradox of Tolerance dalam Implementasi Pengarusutamaan Moderasi Beragama, Satu Perspektif Filsafat Problem Paradox of Tolerance in the Mainstreaming Program of Religious Moderation, A Philosophical Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Religious Moderation is one of the government's priority programs in the field of religion as stated in the 2020-2024 National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN). This program was initiated as a cultural strategy in maintaining the multiculturality of religion and diversity in the country. Nevertheless, the program which was intensified by President Joko Widodo seemed to have a paradoxical side. This paradoxical moment comes from an assumption that the mainstreaming program of religious moderation, which promotes tolerant religious practices, actually acts intolerantly towards religious groups that are contrary to the view of the government. The state, in this case, is seen as undertaking a self-defense mechanism to maintain the religious practice it wants by eliminating different views. Through a critical explanation of the religious moderation program in existentialist and evolutionist perspectives, and using the views of Karl R. Popper, Will Kymlicka, and Amartya Sen, this research answers these assumptions.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Abror, Mhd. “Moderasi Beragama dalam Bingkai Toleransi: Kajian Islam dan Keberagaman.” Jurnal Rusydiah I no. 2 (2020): 143-155.
Adian, Donny Gahral. Percik Pemikiran: Sebuah Pengantar Komprehenshif. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2006.
Akhmadi, Agus. “Moderasi Beragama dalam Keragaman Indonesia.” Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan 13 no. 2 (2019): 45-55.
Arif, Syaiful. “Moderasi Beragama dalam Diskursus Negara Islam: Pemikiran KH Abdurrahman Wahid”. Jurnal Bimas Islam 13 no. 1 (2020): 74-75.
Bakhtiar, Amsal. Filsafat Agama: Wisata Pemikiran dan Kepercayaan Manusia. Depok: Rajagrafindo, 2017.
Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. Peny. Haz Algebra. Manado: GIK, 2006.
Eggers, Wolfgang. Marx-Angels on Religion. Moskow: Cominter, 2015.
Hefni, Wildani. “Moderasi Beragama dalam Ruang Digital: Studi Pengarusutamaan Moderasi Beragama Di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri”. Jurnal Bimas Islam 13, no. 1 (2020): 1-22.
Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Popper, Karl R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. New Jersey: Princeton University, 1996.
Roswantoro, Alim. Keberagamaan Otentik dalam Eksistensialisme Religius. Desertasi pada Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2007.
Rouf, Abdul. “Penguatan Landasan Teologis: Pola Mewujudkan Moderasi Kehidupan Beragama”. Jurnal Bimas Islam 13 no. 1 (2020): 125-126.
Sen, Amartya. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2006.
Soelaiman, Darwis A. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan, Perspektif Barat dan Islam. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publising, 2019.
Setyowati, Nanik, Fatmawati, dan Siti Maizul Habibah. “Moderasi Beragama dalam Upaya Internalisasi Nilai Toleransi pada Generasi Z.” Jurnal Keindonesiaan 2 no.1 (2022): 126-135.
Sugiharto, Wakhid dan Syaiful Arif, ed., Direktori Kasus-kasus Aliran, Pemikiran, Paham, dan Gerakan Keagamaan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Balitbangdiklat Kemenag, 2012.
Sutrisno, Edy. “Aktualisasi Moderasi Beragama di Lembaga Pendidikan”. Jurnal Bimas Islam 12, no. 2 (2019): 323–348.
Tim Penyusun. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia V Edisi Daring. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan Bahasa dan Perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, 2016.
Tim Penyusun Balitbangdiklat. Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama, 2019.
Tim Penyusun Balitbangdiklat. Tanya Jawab Moderasi Beragama. Balitbang Diklat Kementerian Agama, 2019.
Tjaya, Thomas Hidya. Kierkegaard dalam Pergulatan Menjadi Diri Sendiri. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2004.
Internet:
Bayu, Dimas. “Sebanyak 86,9 Persen Penduduk Indonesia Beragama Islam,” 2022. Diakses tanggal 22 November 2022. https://dataindonesia.id/ragam/detail/ sebanyak-869-penduduk-indonesia-beragama-islam.
Wawancara:
Saifuddin, Lukman Hakim (Inventor Moderasi Beragama), wawancara oleh Sigit Kamseno pada Program Penguatan Moderasi Beragama Ditjen Bimas Islam Kementerian Agama, Hotel Grand Mercure Jakarta. Tanggal 3 Juni 2022.