Analisis Hukum Pemidanaan Pelanggaran Perkawinan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstraksi
Pemidanaan pelanggaran perkawinan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung adalah berkisar seputar poligami dan perkawinan di bawah tangan. Dasar hukum material yang diterapkan untuk menjerat pelanggaran perkawinan adalah KUHP (Pasal 279). Sedangkan Perundang-undangan administrasi perkawinan yang bersanksi pidana (administrative penal law), dalam Undang-undang No. 22 Tahun 1946 jo. Undang-undang No. 32 Tahun 1954 dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 9 Tahun 1975 tidak dipakai sama sekali. Dengan menerapkan studi hukum normative (law in book), tampaknya implementasi kebijakan pidana (penal policy) pelanggaran perkawinan lebih baik diatur dalam Undang-undang pidana (KUHP) daripada Perundang-undangan hukum pidana atau Perundang-undangan administasi yang bersanksi pidana.
Abstract
Criminalization of marriage in violation of Supreme Court decisions are revolved around polygamy and marriage under the hand. The legal basis of the material that is applied to ensnare marriage is a Criminal Code/KUHP (Article 279). But, administrative penal law, in Law No. 22 Year 1946 jo. Law No. 32 Year 1954 and Government Regulation No. 9 The year 1975 was not used at all. By applying the study of normative law (law in book), it seems penal policy on Criminal Cases of Marriage is better regulated in a Criminal Code/KUHP rather than penal law or administrative penal law.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, putusan.mahkamahagung.go.id, diunggah pada 20/9/2015.
Harahap, Yahya, Hukum Perkawinan Nasional, Medan: CV Zahir Tranding CO, 1975.
Ishom, Muhammad, Mungurai Akar Masalah Gratifikasi Penghulu dan Mahalnya Biaya Pencatatan Perkwaninan, Banten: LPM IAIN “SMH†Banten, 2013.
Lamintang, P.P.A.F., Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1990.
Moeljanto, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Renika Cipta, 2000.
Nasution, Khoiruddin, Hukum Perdata (Keluarga) Islam Indonesia dan Perkembangan Hukum Perkawinan di Dunia Muslim, Yogyakarta: ACAdeMia dan TAZZAFA, 2009.
Poernomo, Bambang, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1987.
Prasetyo, Teguh dan Abdul Halim Barkatulloh, Politik Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.
Projodikoro, Wirjono, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2003.
Rasyid, Sulaiman, Fiqh Islam Jakarta, 2001.
Soetami, Siti, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1993.
Sudarto, Kapita Selekta Hukum, Bandung: Alumni, 1983.